Micro-Abstract
This Developer Guide defines the AEGON™ Policy Compiler: a deterministic compiler that maps a finite semantic regime (failure-class ontology) into a canonical policy artifact (policy bundle / Policy IR). AEGON compilation is total, repeatable, and audit-friendly, and it treats non-action as an explicit compiled result. The compiler emits declarative artifacts only; it does not execute, enforce, learn, infer, optimize, or remediate.
Table of Contents
- §1 Overview
- §2 Conceptual Model
- §3 Inputs and Outputs
- §4 Failure-Class Semantics
- §5 Policy Bundles and Policy IR
- §6 Minimal Policy Language
- §7 Opcodes and Constructs
- §8 Parsing and Canonicalization
- §9 Compilation Determinism
- §10 Errors and Diagnostics
- §11 Security and Governance
- §12 Example Workflows
- §13 Integration Patterns
- §14 Licensing and Support
- §15 Scope, Non-Goals, and Conclusion
- Appendices
📘 Related Paper
The mathematical foundation for AEGON failure semantics is defined in the AEGON Algebra (finite semantic ontology, partial orders / joins, deterministic interpretation, and policy compilation semantics).
§1 Overview
The AEGON™ Policy Compiler is a deterministic compilation system that converts a finite semantic classification (a failure-class regime) into a canonical policy artifact (a policy bundle). The compiler is designed for reliability workflows where semantic clarity, repeatability, and governance are required.
AEGON is intended to operate alongside an existing system’s observation pipeline. It consumes the output of a fixed deterministic classifier (defined in the AEGON Algebra) and emits a structured policy bundle suitable for downstream review, auditing, dispatch, or controlled execution by separate systems.
§2 Conceptual Model
The AEGON compilation pipeline is intentionally minimal: observations are normalized, classified into a finite semantic regime, and compiled into a canonical policy artifact.
| Stage | Object | Deterministic Output |
|---|---|---|
| Observe | Normalized observation | o ∈ O |
| Classify | Failure-class regime | C(o) ∈ F |
| Compile | Policy bundle / Policy IR | Π(C(o)) ∈ P |
| Serialize | Canonical JSON | S(Π(C(o))) ∈ 𝒥 |
§3 Inputs and Outputs
AEGON consumes a failure-class regime (or a classifier output that resolves to a regime) and produces a policy bundle. The compiler is deterministic: identical semantic input yields identical policy output.
§3.1 Inputs
Inputs are semantic regimes in a finite ontology. The precise observation structure is not required by the compiler; the compiler operates over F, not raw telemetry.
§3.2 Outputs
Outputs are policy bundles in a structured Policy IR, suitable for canonical serialization and downstream processing. Policy bundles represent declarative intent (e.g., freeze mutation, isolate dependency, page on-call) and are not executable by themselves.
{
"tier": "pro",
"on": "CONTROL_PLANE_SATURATION",
"actions": [
{ "name": "freeze_control_plane", "params": { "window_minutes": 30 } },
{ "name": "page_oncall", "params": { "severity": "high" } }
],
"evidence": ["incident_id", "top_signals", "invariant_summary"],
"notes": ["compiled_deterministically", "non_executing_artifact"]
}
Annotation: A canonical policy bundle is an auditable artifact. Enforcement is external to AEGON.
§4 Failure-Class Semantics
AEGON relies on a finite semantic ontology of failure classes. These failure classes represent violated structural invariants and are treated as semantic atoms of system interpretation. A partial order over failure classes represents semantic dominance (escalation and containment), enabling canonical reconciliation where multiple regimes apply.
Where joins are defined, AEGON can reconcile multi-regime evidence by selecting a least upper bound, producing a single canonical regime rather than competing interpretations.
§5 Policy Bundles and Policy IR
A policy bundle is a structured object that binds a triggering failure class to a canonical set of policy actions, capability gates, evidence requirements, and human-facing annotations. The Policy IR is designed to be stable, serializable, and governance-friendly.
§5.1 Bundle Components
| Field | Purpose | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| on | Triggering failure class | Finite ontology; deterministic selection |
| tier | Capability gate / entitlement | Optional; enables controlled exposure |
| actions | Ordered declarative action list | Order is meaningful; execution is external |
| evidence | Required explanatory artifacts | Supports audit, review, governance |
| notes | Human-facing annotations | Non-normative, informational |
§5.2 Neutral Policy
Non-action is represented explicitly as a neutral policy bundle. This prevents “implicit defaults” from being conflated with semantic meaning. If the semantic regime is neutral (no violated invariants), compilation yields a neutral bundle with an empty action list (or an explicit no-op action).
§6 Minimal Policy Language
AEGON supports a minimal policy language intended for human-authored policy mappings. The language is finite and intentionally non-Turing-complete: it contains no loops, recursion, or dynamic inference. Expressiveness is achieved through the finite choice of failure class and the ordered action list.
§6.1 Minimal Constructs
| Construct | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| TIER | Capability gate | TIER pro |
| ON | Trigger failure class | ON CONTROL_PLANE_SATURATION |
| DO | Emit action | DO freeze_control_plane |
| WITH | Attach parameters | WITH window_minutes=30 |
| END | Close block | END |
§6.2 Code Example
TIER pro ON CONTROL_PLANE_SATURATION DO freeze_control_plane WITH window_minutes=30 DO page_oncall WITH severity=high END
Annotation: The policy language is a presentation layer. Semantics are determined by compilation.
§7 Opcodes and Constructs
In AEGON documentation, “opcode” refers to a minimal syntactic construct with a fixed semantic role in the compilation process. The policy language constructs are treated as opcodes in the sense that they are finite, declarative, and structurally stable.
§7.1 Opcode Semantics Summary
| Opcode | Role | Compiler Impact |
|---|---|---|
| TIER | Gate policy by capability | Sets bundle entitlement metadata |
| ON | Bind to failure class | Determines trigger of bundle |
| DO | Add action | Appends ordered action node |
| WITH | Parameterize action | Attaches finite key–value map |
| END | Close policy block | Commits bundle for canonicalization |
§8 Parsing and Canonicalization
The compiler parses policy source into semantic components (trigger, gate, ordered actions). It then canonicalizes the output: field ordering, normalized parameter formatting, and stable serialization conventions.
§8.1 Canonical JSON
Canonicalization ensures deterministic output across environments. AEGON uses stable ordering and normalization rules to produce bit-for-bit identical serialized policy bundles under identical inputs.
{
"tier": "pro",
"on": "CONTROL_PLANE_SATURATION",
"actions": [
{ "name": "freeze_control_plane", "params": { "window_minutes": 30 } },
{ "name": "page_oncall", "params": { "severity": "high" } }
],
"evidence": [],
"notes": []
}
Annotation: Canonical JSON is deterministic and audit-friendly. It is not an execution plan.
§9 Compilation Determinism
Determinism is a primary property of AEGON compilation. Identical semantic regimes and identical policy mappings yield identical policy bundles. This supports reproducibility, governance, and reliability workflows.
§9.1 Neutrality
Neutrality is explicitly constructed: if the failure class is the neutral regime, the compiled result is a neutral policy bundle. This makes “no action” a first-class semantic result rather than an implicit default.
§10 Errors and Diagnostics
AEGON errors are designed to be deterministic, descriptive, and stable. The compiler should never “guess.” Diagnostic output is intended for developers and operators, and it should support quick resolution and auditing.
§10.1 Error Categories
| Category | Description | Typical Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| ParseError | Invalid syntax or malformed opcode sequence | Fix source policy file; recompile |
| UnknownFailureClass | Trigger references non-ontology symbol | Correct spelling / update mapping |
| InvalidParameter | Parameter violates allowed domain | Normalize types / keys; recompile |
| UnsupportedTier | Capability gate references unknown tier | Adjust tier or gate configuration |
§10.2 Example Diagnostic
[AEGON] ParseError: expected END before EOF at line 6: DO page_oncall hint: close the policy block with END
Annotation: Diagnostics are deterministic and do not alter compilation semantics.
§11 Security and Governance
AEGON is designed to support enterprise governance. The compiler produces artifacts that can be reviewed, signed, staged, audited, and deployed under existing change-control systems. AEGON does not require privileged execution.
§11.1 Auditability
Policy bundles can include evidence requirements and annotations to support traceability. Canonical serialization enables exact comparison across time, environments, and releases.
§11.2 Change Control
AEGON supports a controlled lifecycle: policy source changes are reviewed, compiled, diffed, and promoted through environments. This enables deterministic policy evolution rather than ad hoc live edits.
§12 Example Workflows
This section provides practical workflows showing how AEGON fits into real reliability processes. Examples are declarative and deterministic, and they separate compilation from enforcement.
§12.1 Workflow: Compile a Policy Pack
# 1) Author policy source # 2) Compile to Policy IR # 3) Validate canonical JSON # 4) Promote artifact to staging / production
Annotation: AEGON output is an artifact suitable for promotion pipelines.
§12.2 Workflow: Neutral Regime
# Input: failure class F0 (neutral) # Output: policy bundle p0 with empty action list
Annotation: Non-action is explicitly represented and auditable.
§12.3 Workflow: Multi-Regime Reconciliation (Join)
# Input evidence: regime Fa and regime Fb # Resolve: Fa ∨ Fb (least-dominating regime) # Compile: Π(Fa ∨ Fb) -> canonical policy bundle
Annotation: Reconciliation produces one canonical regime (no competing interpretations).
§13 Integration Patterns
AEGON integrates cleanly with existing observability and incident workflows because it outputs declarative policy bundles. The compiler does not require invasive changes to the runtime system.
§13.1 Pattern: CI/CD Policy Artifact Promotion
Treat compiled policy bundles like build artifacts: versioned, diffed, approved, and promoted. This supports stable governance and deterministic rollback.
§13.2 Pattern: Human-in-the-Loop Approval
AEGON can be deployed as a semantic policy generator whose output requires explicit approval before execution by downstream systems. This supports high-safety environments and legal review.
§13.3 Pattern: External Enforcement Layer
Downstream enforcement systems interpret AEGON policy bundles and perform controlled actions. AEGON remains agnostic to the enforcement mechanism, preserving semantic stability.
§14 Licensing and Support
AEGON is distributed as a deterministic compiler with documentation and canonical output formats. Licensing may vary by tier, deployment model, and support requirements.
§14.1 Support Scope
Support typically includes: policy language onboarding, canonical output validation, integration guidance, and deterministic compilation troubleshooting. Enforcement-layer engineering is explicitly out of scope unless contracted separately.
§15 Scope, Non-Goals, and Conclusion
AEGON is a deterministic compiler from finite failure semantics to canonical policy artifacts. Its value is semantic stability: a finite ontology of regimes, repeatable compilation, and audit-friendly outputs that support governance.
By separating interpretation (failure-class semantics) from action representation (policy bundles), AEGON supports enterprise-grade reliability workflows where deterministic meaning and controlled response are required.
Appendices
Appendix A — Glossary
Key terms used throughout this Developer Guide.
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| AEGON | Finite semantic system for deterministic classification and compilation of policy artifacts. |
| Failure Class | A semantic atom representing a violated structural invariant of a system. |
| Ontology | A finite, closed set of meaningful regimes in a domain (here: failure classes). |
| Semantic Regime | A resolved failure-class interpretation that represents the system’s meaning-state for policy selection. |
| Policy Bundle | A structured declarative artifact containing trigger, gate, actions, evidence, and annotations. |
| Policy IR | The internal representation schema for policy bundles (stable and serializable). |
| Canonicalization | Normalization rules producing stable, deterministic output under identical inputs. |
| Neutral Policy | Explicit compiled non-action bundle corresponding to the neutral semantic regime. |
| Determinism | Same input yields same output under repeated evaluation, independent of time or environment. |
Appendix B — Error Catalog
This catalog lists common compiler error classes in stable, deterministic form. Implementations may extend this list without changing the semantics of existing errors.
| Error Code | Name | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| E001 | ParseError | Invalid opcode sequence or malformed policy source. |
| E002 | UnknownFailureClass | Policy references a failure class symbol not in the finite ontology. |
| E003 | InvalidParameter | Parameter violates allowed type or key-domain constraints. |
| E004 | UnsupportedTier | Tier identifier is not recognized by the configured capability gate set. |
Appendix C — Index
Index entries include section numbers using the § symbol.
| Index Entry | Where |
|---|---|
| AEGON overview | §1 |
| Conceptual model (pipeline) | §2 |
| Inputs and outputs | §3 |
| Failure-class semantics | §4 |
| Policy bundles / Policy IR | §5 |
| Minimal policy language | §6 |
| Opcodes and constructs | §7 |
| Parsing and canonicalization | §8 |
| Compilation determinism | §9 |
| Errors and diagnostics | §10, Appendix B |
| Security and governance | §11 |
| Example workflows | §12 |
| Integration patterns | §13 |
| Licensing and support | §14 |
| Scope and non-goals | §15 |
| Glossary | Appendix A |
© 2026 AAD Systems™ · AEGON™ Policy Compiler Developer Guide (Extended Edition v1)